8,760 = continuous 24/7. Use 6,000–7,000 for 2-shift operations, 4,000–5,000 for single shift.
Condenser Options
⚙
Water-cooled: add 20–30% heat of compression to get condenser load. Air-cooled: condenser rejects directly to atmosphere.
Results
Cooling Load (Q)
—
BTU/hr
Chiller Size
—
refrigeration tons
Required GPM
—
chilled water flow
Chiller kW
—
electrical demand
COP
—
coefficient of performance
Condenser Load
—
tower tons rejected
Tower Tons
—
cooling tower size needed
Annual Energy Cost
—
/year at selected rate
Energy Breakdown
ReadyEnter cooling parameters and click Calculate.
Detailed Summary
Cooling Load
Heat load Q
—
Refrigeration tons (÷ 12,000)
—
Fluid correction factor
—
Chilled Water System
Supply temperature (T₁)
—
Return temperature (T₂)
—
Temperature differential (ΔT)
—
Required CHW flow rate
—
GPM per ton
—
Chiller Performance
Chiller efficiency
—
Total chiller kW demand
—
COP (tons × 3.517 ÷ kW)
—
EER (BTU/hr ÷ watts)
—
Condenser / Heat Rejection
Condenser type
—
Heat of compression
—
Total condenser heat rejection
—
Cooling tower size required
—
Annual Energy Cost
Operating hours per year
—
Annual kWh consumed
—
Annual energy cost
—
Cost per ton-hour
—
Live Chiller System Diagram — Updates With Your Inputs
Warm/hot water (heat being carried away)
Chilled/cold water (cooling the process)
Compressor (driven by electricity)
Condenser / heat rejection to atmosphere
The chiller moves heat from the process to the condenser — it does not destroy heat. Every BTU removed from the process must be rejected at the condenser, plus the heat added by the compressor's electrical energy (COP tells you how efficient this transfer is).
How Industrial Chiller Sizing Works
A chiller doesn't create cold — it moves heat. Every BTU your process generates must be collected by the chilled water system and rejected to atmosphere through the condenser. The chiller's compressor provides the "pump" for this heat transfer, consuming electricity in the process. Understanding this relationship is the foundation of accurate industrial chiller sizing: the chiller must handle the process heat, and the condenser must handle the process heat PLUS the compressor heat.
1 Cooling Load (BTU/hr)
The fundamental cooling load equation uses chilled water flow, temperature rise across the load, and the fluid constant. For water, 500 = 8.33 lb/gal × 60 min/hr × Cp 1.0.
Chiller efficiency is rated in kW/ton — lower is better. The Coefficient of Performance (COP) tells you how many BTUs of heat are moved per BTU of electricity consumed. A COP of 5 means you move 5 BTUs of heat for every 1 BTU of electricity.
The condenser must reject both the process heat AND the electrical energy added by the compressor. This is why a cooling tower must be 20–30% larger than the chiller's refrigeration tonnage.
Condenser Load =
Process Heat + Compressor Heat
= Q_chiller + Chiller kW × 3,412
Tower Tons (approx) =
Chiller Tons × 1.25
Why 25% more?
At COP 4.0: heat of compression
= 25% of heat removed
= 125% total condenser load
At COP 6.0: only 17% extra needed
Higher COP → smaller tower
4 Annual Energy Cost
Annual operating cost combines the chiller's electrical demand (kW), operating hours, and local electricity rate. Chiller efficiency has a huge impact — upgrading from 1.0 to 0.6 kW/ton saves 40% of energy cost.
Annual kWh =
Chiller kW × Operating Hours
Annual Cost ($) =
Annual kWh × $/kWh
Savings from efficiency upgrade:
Old kW/ton = 1.0 → 100 ton = 100 kW
New kW/ton = 0.6 → 100 ton = 60 kW
Savings: 40 kW × 6,000 hr × $0.12
= $28,800/yr from one chiller
ROI on high-eff chiller: often 3–5 yr
The #1 Industrial Chiller Oversizing Mistake
The most common and costly chiller sizing error in manufacturing plants is applying too large a safety factor — often 25–50% — on top of a load calculation that already used peak values. The result: a chiller that runs at 30–40% of capacity most of the time, where chiller COP is worst. A chiller running at 100% capacity is more efficient than one running at 40%. Better practice: size the chiller at 110–115% of the calculated load using an accurate load survey. For future expansion, add a second smaller chiller to the system rather than oversizing the first. Part-load efficiency (IPLV rating) is the real-world metric — not just full-load kW/ton.
High-efficiency water-cooled chiller critical at this scale. Upgrading from 1.0 to 0.65 kW/ton saves ~$85,000/yr. Tower requirement: 300 tons. Consider two 120-ton chillers for redundancy and part-load efficiency.
Air-cooled chiller appropriate for smaller hydraulic loads — no cooling tower maintenance. 60°F supply with 15°F ΔT gives wider range = smaller pump. Hydraulic oil heat = 85% of motor kW (15% mechanical losses go elsewhere).
Chiller Sizing Guide by Application
Application
Typical kW/ton
Chiller Type
Supply Temp °F
Rule of Thumb
CNC machining / grinding
0.60–0.80
Water-cooled
50–60°F
15–25 tons per machine
Injection molding
0.55–0.75
Water-cooled
44–50°F
20–40 tons per 1,000-ton press
Hydraulic oil cooling
0.90–1.20
Air-cooled
55–70°F
0.85 × motor kW to BTU/hr
Laser cutting
0.60–0.80
Water-cooled
65–70°F
15–25% of laser rated power
Process reactors
0.55–0.70
Water-cooled
40–55°F
Size from mass flow + ΔH reaction
HVAC / comfort cooling
0.50–0.70
Water-cooled
44°F standard
400 BTU/hr per ft² (light commercial)
Data center cooling
0.40–0.60
Water-cooled (free-cool)
55–65°F
IT load + 20% overhead
Frequently Asked Questions
For electrical motors: multiply motor kW × 3,412 BTU/hr per kW, then multiply by the heat fraction (typically 0.80–0.95 for motors driving fluid pumps or compressors, where most energy converts to heat). For hydraulic systems, assume 80–90% of motor power becomes heat in the hydraulic oil. For resistive heaters: 100% of kW becomes heat. Use the "Area / kW Input" mode in this calculator and select kW to automate this conversion. For spindle motors and servo drives, check the OEM's stated heat rejection rate — often provided in BTU/hr or kW in the machine specifications.
They're the same unit: 1 ton of refrigeration = 12,000 BTU/hr = 3.517 kW. The term "refrigeration ton" comes from the amount of heat required to melt one ton of ice in 24 hours. This unit applies to both process cooling and HVAC applications — there is no difference between a "refrigeration ton" and an "air conditioning ton." Where confusion arises: tower tons (15,000 BTU/hr) are different from refrigeration tons (12,000 BTU/hr) — the tower must reject 25% more heat than the chiller removes.
Water-cooled chillers are 30–40% more efficient than air-cooled (0.55–0.75 vs 0.90–1.20 kW/ton) but require a cooling tower, condenser water pump, and water treatment program. For industrial plants above 50–100 tons with continuous operation, the energy savings almost always justify the water-cooled system within 2–4 years. Air-cooled makes sense for: loads under 50 tons, seasonal or part-time operation, locations with water scarcity, or when the installation cost of cooling tower infrastructure is prohibitive. Note: air-cooled efficiency degrades significantly in hot weather — at 95°F ambient, an air-cooled chiller may derate to 80–90% of its rated capacity.
Always use the warmest supply temperature that meets your process requirement — colder water requires more energy and may cause condensation problems. Standard HVAC: 44°F supply / 54°F return (10°F ΔT). CNC machine tools: 50–60°F supply (check OEM spec — most modern CNC requires only 55–65°F). Injection molding: varies by resin — HDPE runs at 60–70°F mold temp, PET at 40–50°F, ABS at 65–75°F. Hydraulic oil coolers: 65–80°F supply. Each 1°F increase in chilled water supply temperature improves chiller efficiency by approximately 1.5–2%. Running at 50°F instead of 44°F saves 9–12% of chiller energy.
You need glycol only if the chilled water temperature at any point could drop below 35°F (with 5°F safety margin above freezing). For standard 44°F supply systems, pure water is fine. Use glycol when: supply temperature is below 40°F; the chiller evaporator could freeze during off-hours; the system runs in a freezing environment. Glycol reduces the heat capacity of the fluid (lower Cp), so you'll need higher flow rates or accept higher supply temperature. Ethylene glycol 25% protects to 15°F; 50% to −35°F. Propylene glycol is preferred for food and pharmaceutical applications due to its lower toxicity. Always account for the glycol correction factor in sizing calculations — this calculator does this automatically.